It came up today as it will now and then; I often resort to a generalized
anthropic principle to explain everyday phenomena. Briefly, many answers to questions are given by the fact that one is asking them. I don't invoke advanced scientific theories or purport to explain human existence (as is often the use of the principle) but rather for a broader set of circumstances. Do I have to explain more fully what this means? Maybe I'll think up a good set of examples and you can extrapolate the idea yourself.

While we're on the subject of neologisms, I should mention Fabrizio's new one: "The pot knows best." That is to say, an inversion of "The pot calling the kettle black", normally used to signify the hypocrisy of criticism from an accuser having committed the same act. But really, who better to recognize an bad act than one who perpetrates it? I like that Fabrizio's turn of phrase highlights the
ad hominem defense of an offense, as if somehow deriding a person could negate a transgression.

I tried to make up a pun on the fly earlier this week but it didn't work. I wanted to say something like, "put the (xxx) in dyslexia", where (xxx) was some backwards subword of "dyslexia". Unfortunately for me, "aixelsyd" doesn't contain any English words! It took me a few moments to verify that fact in my head, so my pun would have been
esprit d'escalier in any case.
The notion persists but I am stymied! I am asking for help constructing a pun in the same vein: try to find a word whose meaning supports an alternate subword construction so that we can say: "put the (xxx) in (yyy)", where (xxx) is a subword of (yyy) via the meaning of yyy.